Jamie Reimagines Exams
A few years ago I got frustrated with traditional exams. They were not exciting. They were not a celebration of student learning. It wasn’t a showcase of a semester of hard work. It was a stressful slugfest for our students to regurgitate a semester's worth of learning in an arbitrarily short amount of time. I realized I didn’t like my traditional exam because it was filled with questions, curriculum and content that I thought was the most important. In a classroom where student voice is valued, I didn’t think this was an appropriate send off to my students. I wanted to know what they found to be the most important components of my course. I wanted to know what they learned, without having to force them down one defined path.
So I mixed it up. Last year I gave my Advanced Functions students a choice. They could complete a traditional final exam or they could complete a more open ended exam. I called it the “Modern Exam”.
I allowed my students to change their minds up to the moment the exam was put in front of them. I spent lots of time leading up to the final exam coaching each student about the choice they wanted to make. I provided lots of review, study tips and time to prepare. In the end, about a third of my class chose to attempt the Modern Exam. This year, I’m providing this choice again and seeing about 50% of my students choose to try the more open ended exam.
The results don’t disappoint me either.
Matt Reimagines Final Performance Tasks
In our Art classes, we were also growing tired of our final performance task in grade 9 art. The results of project that we had designed and used the last few years ticked all the boxes, it was safe, and well, a little formulaic. It didn’t provide room for students to flex their creative muscle and lean on their strengths as creators. So as part of a final 30% pilot, we redesigned the final performance task. We called the project “Not-A-Box”, a reference to the imaginative children’s book by Antoinette Portis. Our aim was to provide some structure and boundaries at the beginning of the project, by requiring students to choose two aspects of our learning from the art course. The other requirement was that the students were provided with a cardboard box. They had to re-imagine the box into an art piece and they had to use the entire box to do so. The results were creative, and incredibly widely varied. It was great to see students pulling this project in different directions. There was healthy creative friction for some as they worked through what direction they wanted to take their work. This is the first iteration of this project, so we will tweak and improve the project for the upcoming semester.
Both of us liked how the “Modern Exam” and “Not-a-Box” allowed students to access their own strengths. Students had to be pretty self-reflective and look back on their own experiences in our courses. In both our math and art courses we need to get better at supporting students as they explore their own choices in how they show us what they know. We like that we are moving away from a teacher-student model to a model that more reflects mentorship.
If you had the ability, what would you change about your Final 30% Tasks?